[ad_1]
A very long time in the past, in a galaxy far, distant, there was the Polar Pacer watch. This was an period earlier than GPS, earlier than optical HR, and earlier than numerous different metrics that we didn’t even know would exist sometime. Again then, it was time to social gathering prefer it was…err…1990. As a result of that’s about when the unique Polar Pacer got here out. Nonetheless, fast-forward a few years and Polar is reviving the model with two new watches: The Polar Pacer & Polar Pacer Professional. This submit is in regards to the Polar Pacer Professional, whereas the inexpensive Polar Pacer will arrive in just a few months.
So what’s the Polar Pacer Professional? Effectively, in a nutshell, it’s principally a Polar Vantage M2, however with nearly all of the options of the GRIT X collection. So it provides a barometric altimeter, Hill Splitter, Operating Energy, Muscle Load, Strava Reside Segments, and programs/routing. Thus, whereas Polar is branding and advertising this closely as a working watch, virtually talking, it’s a full multisport watch.
The Polar Pacer Professional additionally has a brand new show, sooner processor, and extra reminiscence. You received’t discover/care in regards to the reminiscence, however the processor is noticeably sooner in some instances. And the show is best, albeit undoubtedly not groundbreaking. And regardless of rumors on the contrary, it’s not an AMOLED/LCD show (just like the Polar Unite or Polar Ignite), however a much less flashy MIPS show such as you’d see on a Garmin Forerunner or Fenix collection (amongst many different watches).
As standard, this watch is a media loaner, and it’ll return to Polar shortly. This evaluate shouldn’t be sponsored (nor does any firm get to preview something I evaluate), and I don’t take any advertiser cash from any firms I evaluate. And as common readers know, if one thing is crap, I’m gonna inform it brutally like it’s – regardless of the model. As soon as this unit goes again, I’ll exit and get my very own for any future testing wants. In case you discovered this evaluate helpful, you should utilize the hyperlinks on the backside, or take into account turning into a DCR Supporter which makes the location ad-free, whereas additionally having access to a largely weekly video collection behind the scenes of the DCR Cave. And naturally, it makes you superior.
With that, let’s dig into the novelty.
What’s New:
The Polar Pacer Professional is essentially about shifting higher-end options down-level to a sub-$300 value level. So in impact, nearly nothing is ‘new to Polar’ right here (besides the strolling check). Which is frankly how most manufacturers are doing it as of late (together with Garmin). However extra on that later.
Provided that the final time there was a Polar Pacer product was 30 years in the past, I’m going to skip 30 years of smartwatch enhancements (as enjoyable as that’d be). As an alternative, I’m going to make use of the Polar Vantage M2, which can also be priced at $299. Whereas one would possibly try to argue the Polar M430, that’s 5 years outdated and properly previous smelly. No, the Vantage M2 is the fitting comparability. So, right here’s the way it differs:
– Added barometric altimeter
– Added sooner processor, extra reminiscence
– Added new clearer display screen/show
– Added wrist-based working energy (no equipment required)
– Added Hill Splitter (hill repeat counter)
– Added route navigation
– Added Strava Reside Segments
– Added Efficiency Assessments (Strolling, Operating, Biking)
– Added Polar SHIFT strap accent compatibility
– Added Compass throughout exercise/exercise
– Added Smartphone notifications throughout exercise
– Elevated GPS battery life to 35hrs from 30hrs
– Elevated waterproofing spec to 50m from 30m on Vantage M2
If I’ve acquired every part roughly straight in my head, the important thing variations the M2 doesn’t have that this does is a barometric altimeter, working energy, efficiency checks, longer battery life, SHIFT compatibility, Hill Splitter, Strava Reside Segments, after which Route Navigation.
So at this level, you’ll be able to see that the Pacer Professional principally sideswipes any purpose to purchase the Polar Vantage M2. There’s actually no logical purpose you’d purchase that watch on the similar value (each are at present $299). I’ve gotta marvel if that is Polar quietly killing off the Polar Vantage M lineup (observe formally, they are saying they aren’t). Particularly for the reason that base Polar Pacer principally has nearly all the identical options because the M2, however at $100 much less.
Both means, M2’s destiny apart – what issues right here is options vs not. And there’s completely zero purpose to purchase the Polar Vantage M2 at this juncture (and Polar confirmed the Pacer Professional has each characteristic the Vantage M2 does).
Now, how does it differ from the upcoming (Might-timeframe) $199 Polar Pacer version? Effectively, based on Polar, these are the variations:
– No Barometric Altimeter
– No Hill Splitter
– No Operating Energy
– No Route Navigation
In different phrases, it’s principally a Vantage M2. Really, it has extra options than that because it has the Operating Efficiency check. In any occasion, I don’t have a kind of watches but, so I can’t make any opinions past the specs listed above.
Lastly, what does the Polar Pacer Professional lack in comparison with the costlier Grit X or Polar Vantage V2 (each of that are an identical feature-wise as of late, solely differing in bezel/materials variations)? Ask and also you shall obtain:
– No Leg Restoration Take a look at
– No Orthostatic Take a look at
– No Restoration Professional
– No Touchscreen
– No Trackback navigation
– No Out of doors Dashboards (Altimeter, Coordinates, Compass, Daylight instances)
– No Audio Alerts
– Variations to design/supplies
Acquired all that? Good. Let’s get into the field.
Within the Field:
First up, we’ve acquired the field – or slightly, the field contents.
Inside you’ll discover the watch, a charging cable, paper pile, and strap adapters for the SHIFT straps (these had been beforehand introduced final fall).
I’ll have greater than sufficient photographs of the watch itself on this evaluate, so right here’s a fast one earlier than I doubtlessly get this soiled or scraped up or one thing.
Then we’ve acquired the charging cable. That is, sadly, new. It seems to be similar to the Unite collection charging cables, besides that these are barely rounded, so the 2 aren’t appropriate.
It’s not superior. Whereas the prevailing Polar Vantage collection charging connector/cable isn’t essentially one of the best connector in the marketplace, it’s fairly strong and doesn’t draw any significant annoyance. Whereas this connector appears to always fail to both keep connected after I transfer one thing round on my desk, or, doesn’t ‘click on’ proper into place – making me always double-check alignment. Once more, this isn’t an enormous deal, nevertheless it’s a transparent step again.
Oh, and there’s that small pile of paper guides. You received’t want that both by the point you’re carried out with this evaluate. It principally tells you to clean your wrist and watch each on occasion otherwise you’ll die from dysentery just like the Oregon Path. Additionally, in case you do one thing silly like 32×800 repeats on the monitor, you would possibly die too – during which case it’s undoubtedly your fault (even in case you use Polar Move to create the exercise).
In any case, right here’s the way it compares to the Polar Vantage M2 (left), Pacer Professional (heart), and Grit X Professional (Proper):
Above is straight-on, however you’ll be able to see the show variations extra simply at-angle, the place the newer show is crisper and the blacks are darker/sharper. Taking comparative show images is all the time robust, as a result of the digital camera is actually exposing correctly for just one watch at a time.
Acquired all that? Good, let’s get to utilizing it.
Fundamentals:
This part is all in regards to the primary usability, issues like step/exercise monitoring, sleep monitoring, and primary usability of the watch. By and huge, nothing on this part has modified on this watch in a few years of Polar watches. You’ll be able to choose and select anyone to match it to, and these items has principally remained stagnant (extra on that on the finish of the evaluate).
To start, the Polar Pacer Professional has 5 buttons to navigate all of the capabilities (no touchscreen). Typically talking, the left facet has the again button (backside left) and lock/menu button (higher left), whereas the fitting facet has an up/down choice and the center is your affirmation/enter button.
Arguably the largest improve on the Pacer Professional is the brand new MIPS show. This supplies extra readability than any of Polar’s present Vantage collection watches. This show isn’t AMOLED/OLED/LCD (just like the Ignite/Unite), however akin to what you’d see on different manufacturers
I had no issues in any respect viewing it outdoors in direct solar, nor at sundown on an overcast day, with out a backlight on. There may be backlight although after all, which appears a bit extra ‘clear’ wanting than the Polar Vantage M2, which means there isn’t as a lot white-light from underneath the black areas as there was on that unit. General, this isn’t an enormous change for Polar, however extra of an incremental one. That is kinda just like the processor change – it’s not huge. And in reality, the primary day I used to be utilizing it, it appeared actually fast. However it appears to have slowed barely since then, to principally be the identical in most conditions because the Grit X Professional or Vantage M2. Just a few instances will or not it’s faster.
In the meantime, flipping it over you’ve acquired the optical coronary heart charge sensor. As is custom with Polar watches, each single watch appears to have a distinct optical HR sensor. This time they’ve gone again to the Ignite sensor, seemingly ditching the Polar Vantage V2/Grit X collection sensor (in all probability a good suggestion primarily based on the efficiency I see there). The sensor is used for each exercises in addition to 24×7 monitoring of coronary heart charge.
This additionally consists of the monitoring of sleep metrics, like respiration charge. Word that in a exercise it goes into the next energy mode for extra correct HR measurement there. I level that out as a result of in case you don’t put it (like another watch) into exercise mode, you received’t get correct coronary heart charge measurements throughout high-intensity exercises.
On the strap facet, the unit comes out of the field with a not-quickly-removable-strap. Nonetheless, within the field was the Polar Shift adapter, which principally provides you a typical watch strap mount to attach your individual straps to:
Okay, again to the watch face, and also you’ve acquired so-called ‘Dashboards’. These are principally completely different widget pages that show consolidated details about areas like steps, sleep, exercise historical past, coaching, and extra (equivalent to climate, music controls, and so forth…). The way in which Polar designs their dashboards, is that the primary date/time display screen will be seen always on them, however you’ll be able to iterate what’s proven alongside the underside as a ‘preview’ of extra detailed details about that dashboard web page (e.g. steps/exercises/heart-rate/and so forth…). Right here’s the climate web page instance:
After which I can faucet that to get extra detailed climate info:
The identical is true for steps. And as soon as I crack open the steps web page, I can get extra details about the step depend for the day:
After all, all of this info is then synced to the Polar Move smartphone app (in addition to the Polar Move internet platform). This occurs by way of Bluetooth in your telephone, or a USB cable in your laptop.
The sample is essentially the identical for the opposite information units, like coronary heart charge. On this case, you’ll see your max coronary heart charge in addition to each daytime and sleep minimums. On this case, I suffered by way of the working check just a few hours in the past:
And once more, you’ll discover all this up on Polar Move too:
One space that’s a bit completely different although is the sleep pages. At first look, it appears comparable, however as you dig deeper into it you’ll get a slew of sleep info. This consists of each the Sleep Plus Levels and Nightly Recharge. The primary piece covers facets like what time you went to mattress/woke-up, after which your estimated sleep phases. Whereas the Nightly Recharge seems to be at how recovered you had been that night time. Word that nightly recharge takes three days’ price of knowledge earlier than it begins exhibiting the products, and that the longer you put on the watch (at night time) the higher/extra correct it turns into.
As you open the primary dashboard web page you’ll get a flood of sleep-related information to dig into:
And all of that is additionally extra simply considered within the Polar Move app too:
When it comes to sleep accuracy, the Polar Pacer Professional appropriately recognized the time I fell asleep and the time I awoke, in addition to any time I used to be awake. It additionally guesstimated at my sleep levels. As I’ve talked about quite a few instances, sleep phases/levels is at finest, in a scientific setting extremely wishy-washy, and that’s with full medical gear and a educated workforce doing the evaluation. Thus, it’s not one thing I put a lot religion in on the wearable stage, nor do I’ve any means to precisely check this on a day-to-day foundation.
Past that, there are just a few different dashboards, and you’ll tweak which pages are proven inside the settings, to both embody or skip dashboard pages as you scroll by way of.
When it comes to some fast smartwatch fundamentals, you’ll see textual content messages present up routinely, assuming you’ve acquired it paired up and in-range of your smartphone:
And whereas the watch doesn’t have any music storage on it, you’ll be able to management the music in your telephone. You’ll see that it does pull the right icon for the app it’s controlling, so you’ll be able to see the Spotify icon proven there. I can skip/rewind/pause/play on the primary display screen, in addition to faucet the quantity icon to extend quantity.
And once more, simply to be super-clear right here, there’s no music storage on the Polar Pacer Professional itself, it’s merely controlling music in your telephone.
With all these fundamentals coated, let’s dig into the sporting facet of the unit.
Sports activities Utilization:
The Polar Pacer Professional is by far essentially the most succesful sports activities watch Polar has ever made at this value level (or, anyplace close to it). It’s solely lacking a handful of much less essential options from their higher-end $400-$500 GPS watch lineup. On this part, I’ll dig into how all of the sports-focused options work, since undoubtedly in case you’re shopping for this watch, it’s for the sports activities facets.
First up, to decide on a sport, you’ll both long-hold the purple button, or press the lower-left button and select to start out coaching (or, begin a check – extra on that later). When you’ve carried out that, you’ll be proven your sport profiles, and it’ll begin trying to find coronary heart charge, and GPS (if an out of doors exercise).
The Polar Pacer Professional can retailer as much as 20 sport profiles on it, with every of those profiles having personalized calorie burn, information fields, and different settings (like auto lap). These sport profiles are configured on Polar Move, which is accessible out of your smartphone app or the web site itself. There’s a boatload of profiles to select from, although for essentially the most half many will be fairly comparable. The principle variations are usually personalized calorie burn to that given exercise.
As famous although, that is the place you’ll be able to customise information fields and different settings, for instance making a customized profile for path working with information pages which might be distinctive, versus one other profile for street working.
When you’ve acquired that each one settled, you’ll long-hold the underside left button to sync it again to the watch. The sync takes maybe a minute more often than not, from a smartphone. It’s a bit sooner if doing it on a pc by way of USB cable.
Again on the watch, you’ll see the icons flip inexperienced when it has GPS and coronary heart charge lock. You’ll all the time need to await these earlier than beginning. Typically, you’ll get coronary heart charge lock in 1-5 seconds, and I’ve been getting GPS lock in 10-15 seconds (zero issues there). In case you determine to depart the platform earlier than these lock, you’ll typically have poor outcomes for a lot of your exercise, because it’ll wrestle to seek out lock. In case you’ve acquired any paired sensors (like a Bluetooth Good biking cadence sensor or energy meter, or a Bluetooth Good coronary heart charge strap), it’ll present a blue icon for these.
As for sensor varieties it helps, it’s the identical as earlier than, they’re:
– Bluetooth Good Coronary heart Price Straps
– Bluetooth Good Biking Energy Meters
– Bluetooth Good Biking Cadence & Velocity Sensors
– Bluetooth Good Operating Footpods
– Bluetooth Good Operating Energy Meters
Now the Polar Pacer Professional doesn’t require any working energy meter equipment to get working energy, it does it internally just like the Polar Vantage V & Grit X collection has. Nonetheless, for biking, you have to an exterior energy meter. I attempted connecting it to a pair of Garmin Rally pedals and a pair of PowerTap P2 pedals, and neither labored. That is par for the course with Polar and energy meter assist. I don’t actually know what to say right here, this hasn’t modified in years. Polar was once actually good on Bluetooth accent compatibility, however as of late it’s like they simply don’t care anymore.
To pair sensors, you’ll head to the overall settings menu, after which sensors from there. Word that in case you have a Polar coronary heart charge strap already in your Polar Move account, they really routinely pre-pair them to your watch. Which means, in case you’ve acquired a Polar H10, it’ll truly routinely stick the sensor particulars into the watch whenever you flip it on. Once more, the blue pairing icon on the beginning display screen is your indicator that it’s utilizing that as an alternative of the optical sensor.
For all my testing I used the optical HR sensor on the again of the unit (since I already know the exterior Polar H10 chest strap works completely high quality). So with that set, let’s head out for a easy run first. As you’re working you’ll see your information fields proven on the watch, and you’ll iterate by way of the info pages to see different configured pages.
Whereas I lack many hills, I did get to poke briefly at Hill Splitter, which was added to the Polar Grit X two years in the past. That’s a hill-repeat counter of kinds that routinely detects climbing up a hill, and exhibits you stats for that particular climb.
That is considerably completely different than one thing like Garmin’s ClimbPro, in that ClimbPro is predictive and primarily based on a deliberate route (exhibiting you distance/top until prime of climb). Whereas Polar’s Hill Splitter is all about what you’ve carried out on this present climb. So Garmin is best for occurring a 50KM path run within the Alps with a deliberate route, whereas Polar’s is best for a Tuesday night time hill repeat session in your neighborhood.
Even in case you load a route up on the Polar Pacer Professional, it received’t provide you with that per-climb steerage. Nonetheless, it offers you turn-by-turn steerage if that route comes from Komoot. If you’d like extra particulars on how that works, see my detailed navigation part within the Polar Grit X Professional evaluate, because the performance is identical right here.
Now, within the occasion you loaded up a structured exercise (which you’ll create on Polar Move), then it’ll present the precise targets for these as properly. I did a set of 800 repeats this previous weekend with it, whereby it guided me by way of every exercise stage, together with each work and restoration sections. On this case, I did a exercise with working energy targets for every chunk. Polar working energy hasn’t modified any in the previous few years, nevertheless it’s nice to see it included at this value level built-in.
On this case, it routinely iterated from part to part, successfully urgent the lap button for me. However in non-guided exercises, you’ll be able to press the lap button to create a lap manually, or you are able to do auto laps primarily based on the game profile settings (which may, and certain will, differ between sports activities). Polar additionally helps concurrent computerized and guide laps, in case you need to do completely different evaluation afterward.
Submit-run, you’ll get a abstract of your work on the watch itself, right here’s a gallery of that:
After which all of that is synced to Polar Move in addition to third social gathering websites like Strava or TrainingPeaks.
Throughout my exercises I had zero points when it comes to show visibility or button responsiveness. For pacing stability, that was a bit iffier. So, it is a good time to take a look at one of many two Polar Efficiency checks I did and why that issues, which had been the strolling check after which the working check.
First up is the brand new strolling check. The idea behind that is that the Polar Pacer Professional can decide your VO2Max from simply strolling for quarter-hour. Although, as I’d discover out, you need to stroll actually darn quick to maintain the watch joyful. First up, you’ll warm-up for five minutes:
Then, it asks you to speed-up to maintain your coronary heart charge above 121bpm (or, not less than 121bpm in my case). And also you’ll keep at that for 10 minutes. I’d level out that for healthier people, you would possibly discover this difficult. In actual fact, so did Polar. For your entire check period, each few seconds it was yelling at me to not run. I wasn’t working (not even shut), however, apparently my quick strolling pace made it suppose I used to be. However retaining my HR excessive sufficient was difficult.
On the finish of the check, it mentioned my VO2Max was 48. Typically talking, after I check (both lab or on different watches), I float within the 58-61 vary. So, this was considerably decrease than that. Massively decrease.
So, the subsequent day I went out and did the Polar Operating Take a look at. I figured on this I’d in all probability check a bit of bit decrease than regular, since this has been my 4th consecutive day of working, however that’s high quality. The Operating Take a look at begins off with a 10-minute warm-up, after which resets again to a painfully sluggish 20-30 minute construct from quick strolling up all the best way as much as dying whereas working. It’s principally a ramp check, whereby you fail when you’ll be able to’t keep the requested tempo any longer. One concern I’d observe is that with the GPS wobble, I noticed instant-pace responsiveness that was a bit bizarre at instances. That mattered within the run check, as a result of as I’d make lengthy/lazy activates the trail (not 90° angles), the tempo would possibly drop (or rise) considerably, which in flip upset the run check app that might warn me if I spent an excessive amount of day trip of zone. It reset as soon as truly, and I needed to begin once more early on within the first check. However the second check went high quality.
On this check, I scored 56, which is about the place I figured I’d be on barely sore legs. Contemporary legs/restoration would in all probability have put me at 58 or so.
Both means, that is massively completely different than the 48 from the brand new strolling check. I requested Polar in regards to the discrepancy on my strolling check, however didn’t obtain any reply as to why there was such a discrepancy. It’s an odd miss for an organization that typically will get physio-type sports activities metrics/testing proper.
After your exercise you’ll be able to evaluate all of this info – each checks and common exercises – on Polar Move. Within the case of normal exercises, these will even sync over to any third social gathering related platforms you’ve arrange like Strava or TrainingPeaks. And naturally, you’ll be able to simply view the small print proper within the Polar Move app itself:
As for the checks, these too present up in a devoted part for struggling (testing):
And in spite of everything that, you’ll be able to return to your dashboards and get options from FitSpark for stretching or different supportive exercises:
Every day it’ll provide you with a recommended cardio exercise, after which after you’ve accomplished that (or another exercise), it’ll provide you with a supportive or energy exercise. These aren’t tied to a selected coaching plan (like constructing in direction of a marathon), however slightly, geared toward providing you with a ‘Exercise of the day’ idea. And doing so in a means that doesn’t get you injured.
Relying on the kind of exercise you select it’ll provide the particular steps and steerage within the watch itself. There are cardio-focused working exercises with completely different intensities. After which there are core sort exercises too, and for these, it’ll provide the particular strikes to do, together with animations and textual content for each:
Once more, in case you’re on a structured coaching plan in direction of a specific-season race, this frankly isn’t for you. As an alternative, it’s for folk who don’t have a selected coaching plan, however simply need to preserve lively in an endurance-sports-focused method. The watch received’t fiddle, it’ll throw down strong exercise options, so don’t suppose you’re simply gonna get a bunch of 30-minute easy-peasy stretching exercises.
In the meantime, in case you’re on a structured coaching plan, then you definitely’ll in all probability be utilizing the Cardio Load standing parts. However first, you’ve acquired the Weekly Coaching dashboard, which exhibits you your coaching load every week (in my case, resetting yesterday), inclusive of the precise HR zone breakdowns.
Nonetheless, in live performance with that’s the precise Cardio Load dashboard. This exhibits you whether or not or not your coaching is productive. On the primary dashboard web page you’ll see a fast overview, after which when you dig into it, you’ll get the precise particulars of what it thinks about your exercise habits:
Word that the core distinction right here to the Polar Vantage V/Grit collection is that these even have Restoration Professional monitoring, whereas the Polar Pacer Professional doesn’t have that. Although, that does require a chest strap not less than 3 times per week to get the total Orthostatic check and related restoration information. Nonetheless, you should utilize the Nightly Recharge information on the Vantage M2 (as mentioned earlier within the fundamentals part) as a fairly good proxy for restoration.
GPS & HR Accuracy Testing:
There’s probably no matter that stirs as a lot dialogue and keenness as GPS accuracy. A watch might collapse and provide you with dire electrical shocks whereas doing so, but when it exhibits you on the improper facet of the street? Oh hell no, convey on the fury of the web!
GPS accuracy will be checked out in numerous alternative ways, however I favor to take a look at it utilizing numerous units in real-world eventualities throughout an enormous variety of actions. I take advantage of 2-6 different units without delay, making an attempt to get a transparent image of how a given set of units handles situations on a sure day. Circumstances embody every part from tree/constructing cowl to climate.
Through the years, I’ve continued to tweak my GPS testing methodology. For instance, I don’t place two models subsequent to one another on my wrists, as that may influence sign. However typically I’ll merely carry different models by the straps, or connect them to the shoulder straps of my hydration backpack. Carrying a number of watches on the identical wrist is well-known to influence optical HR accuracy. Within the case of the Polar Pacer Professional, Polar confirmed the GPS chipset is identical as discovered within the Vantage M2 collection (which, is principally the identical as all their current watches – primarily based on Sony).
In the meantime, for HR accuracy testing I’m sometimes carrying a chest strap (normally the Garmin HRM-PRO, or Polar H10) in addition to one other optical HR sensor watch on the bicep (recently the Whoop 4.0 band and/or Polar Verity Sense). Word that the numbers you see within the higher proper nook are *not* the averages, however slightly simply the precise level my mouse is sitting over. Word all this information is analyzed utilizing the DCR Analyzer, particulars right here.
We’ll begin off with comparatively straightforward exercises, earlier than stepping into extra complicated exercises. First up is a steady-state run, which wasn’t in super-complex GPS situations. That is in comparison with a Polar H10 chest strap, and a Garmin Descent G1 watch on the opposite wrist (principally an Intuition 2 Photo voltaic however for diving). Right here’s that HR information set:
That is truly a textbook-perfect case of when optical HR can do higher than chest straps in early spring/fall situations. In these instances you’re typically carrying lighter clothes, and thus sweat much less early on. So that you see right here the Polar H10 was truly improper for the primary few minutes, however the optical HR sensors had been right (each Garmin and Polar). Inside a couple of minutes all three converged. You do nonetheless see just a few drops/spikes from the Polar Pacer Professional although about 1/third of the best way by way of the exercise. Although, these solely lasted just a few seconds, after which went away.
On the GPS facet of that exercise, at a excessive stage issues look high quality.
Nonetheless, as you zoom in, not one of the models did significantly properly for the underpass, together with each strategy and exit of it. For this part, the Garmin Descent G1 was offset greater than the others.
Nonetheless, a minute or so later, we’d see me swimming within the canal from the Polar Pacer Professional. This could have been straightforward pickings for GPS right here, because it’s a straight path with nearly no significant tree cowl this time of yr. Once more, this isn’t unhealthy, it’s simply meh.
Subsequent we’ve acquired an interval run, with 800s tossed into it, in addition to being each within the bushes and the open. This was in contrast in opposition to the identical set of watches and HR straps, besides, I added the Whoop 4.0 band to the combo as properly. As you’ll be able to see, the Polar Pacer Professional optical HR nailed this one. Whereas the Garmin Descent G1 had some substantial points on the peaks of every interval (what’s odd is that it appeared to trace the preliminary ramp of every interval the place sensors fail). There have been just a few very minor nitpicky bobbles from the Polar Pacer Professional, however once more, you’ll be able to’t even discover them except you actually squint and look shut. Stable job right here.
On the GPS facet for this set, I used to be largely within the woods (or underneath tree cowl). And once more, at a excessive stage issues look OK – albeit you’ll be able to see hints of hassle brewing down beneath:
Not one of the models had main failures right here, however once more each the Polar Pacer Professional and Descent G1 simply wobbled a bit off-track, normally by upwards of 15-25 meters. Beneath you’ll be able to see that within the lower-left part it was the Polar lacking the flip, whereas within the mid-section it was the Garmin being offset.
After which right here in deeper woods, each the Descent G1 and Polar Pacer models had been offset from the monitor. Albeit, the Garmin Intuition 2 did keep on-trail, which is notable as a result of in concept the Descent G1 and Intuition 2 are the identical watch underneath the covers.
Subsequent, we’ve acquired the working check I did. In concept this needs to be a comparatively straightforward optical coronary heart charge check, for the reason that charge of change is exceptionally low (okay, painfully low). It’s normally charge of change that impacts optical HR essentially the most (so a sudden dash for instance). And certainly, this was just about spot-on with the Garmin HRM-PRO chest strap. The Whoop had some bobbles through the ramp portion for a minute or two, however in any other case all of them matched.
Once more GPS-wise I used to be largely within the woods right here, albeit on largely straight paths.
As with earlier than, we see some off-track points from the Polar Pacer Professional, equivalent to this part beneath within the decrease proper the place it will get actually wobbly as I’m strolling (nearly immediately on the precise spot I transition from onerous run to cool-down, it goes askew). After which stays offset by way of a lot of the means throughout the wetlands.
On this different part, we see each the Apple Watch Sequence 7 and Polar Pacer Professional commerce turns in being offset, although, the Intuition appears to nail this part. The Apple Watch’s failures are largely the age-old Mario Kart cornering it does each on occasion (exhibited right here at low-speed turns). Whereas the Pacer Professional’s points had been simply being offset from the monitor. Although, nearly all of the exercise was largely right.
Lastly, we’ve acquired an indoor biking exercise on a Peloton Bike. This wasn’t an excellent intense exercise, however is nonetheless an excellent check to double-check. That is in comparison with the Descent G1’s optical HR, and the Polar H10 chest strap (paired to the bike). On this set, it developments properly sufficient, nonetheless, you see about half a dozen HR spikes all through. That is one thing I’ve seen on different current Polar watches with a barely completely different optical HR sensor (Vantage & Grit X collection), although haven’t seen it a lot on the opposite datasets from the Polar Pacer Professional. Once more, it’s minor right here, however does stick out when it occurs.
Okay, so general apart from just a few minor points, the optical coronary heart charge on the Polar Pacer Professional did properly for me in my testing, and once more appears to reflect my sentiment that the current Vantage M2 & Grit X Professional sensors aren’t fairly as reliable because the sensor used right here and initially within the Polar Ignite 2. In these instances, it’s carried out fairly properly, even throughout demanding intervals.
As for GPS, it’s a strong ‘meh’. It did higher than the Garmin Descent G1 (dive-focused watch), however typically was overwhelmed barely by the Garmin Intuition 2. It didn’t have any huge errors, however simply wasn’t write-home-great both. I fear that for a tool positioned to compete for the subsequent 1-2 years, it might need challenges doing in order different distributors implement dual-frequency GPS on the mid-range tiers. I feel you will get by with out dual-frequency so long as your common GNSS efficiency is ok, and that is proper on the road of ‘high quality’. Once more, not unhealthy, simply not nice.
(Word: The entire charts in these accuracy sections had been created utilizing the DCR Analyzer device. It lets you examine energy meters/trainers, coronary heart charge, cadence, pace/tempo, GPS tracks, and lots extra. You should use it as properly on your personal gadget comparisons, extra particulars right here.)
Wrap-Up:
The Polar Pacer Professional is a conflicting watch to me. From a usability standpoint, it largely works properly and does precisely what it says it’s going to do. If I examine it to current higher-end Polar watches, they principally simply gave you nearly no purpose to purchase their higher-end models – with only some options lacking. And the show is unquestionably extra readable – which is nice. The half that leaves me conflicted is that in some ways I really feel like that is largely simply re-arranging the (options) chairs on the deck. Exempting the brand new stroll check that clearly didn’t work, there’s nothing new from Polar right here. And I fear, not sufficient motion to excite potential patrons away from the competitors.
What makes this much more conflicting is that within the grand scheme of issues, Garmin & COROS additionally do the identical when it comes to taking higher-end options and shifting them downstream to cheaper watches. Besides the basic (and big) distinction is the pace at which that occurs. Polar is actually taking options from 4-7 years in the past and shifting them down-level. Whereas when Garmin iterates to the sub-$300 stage, it’s taking options from 1-2 years in the past and making them obtainable. If we take a look at this watch purely from a working standpoint (which is how Polar explicitly markets it) – it has a really difficult time competing with the $199-$299 competitors together with Garmin & COROS (particularly in Garmin’s case with PacePro, or COROS’s case with the $199 pricing). And I solely anticipate that hole to considerably widen over the course of 2022.
The extra I give it some thought, I feel Polar’s mistake was truly making an attempt to revive the Polar Pacer branding for this watch and billing it as a “Runner’s Watch”. Sure, it really works good for runners, however from a runner’s standpoint, it’s simply not aggressive to the opposite choices. As an alternative, the place it’s extremely aggressive is as a triathlete/multisport watch. It’s a really very superb deal there, and whereas COROS is less expensive at $199, COROS can’t maintain a candle to Polar’s efficiency monitoring and every day exercise facets (and even the Polar Move app/platform).
I don’t know how you can tie all that up right into a nifty bow to finish this evaluate in a single satisfying paragraph, aside from to say that typically it’s not in regards to the expertise or the options, however the way you body the intentions. And on this case, regardless of how good the tech is, it’s framed for the improper viewers. However in case you’re a triathlete, it’s a hidden gem.
With that – thanks for studying!
Discovered This Submit Helpful? Help The Web site!
Hopefully you discovered this evaluate helpful. On the finish of the day, I’m an athlete similar to you in search of essentially the most element doable on a brand new buy – so my evaluate is written from the standpoint of how I used the machine. The opinions typically take lots of hours to place collectively, so it’s a good bit of labor (and labor of affection). As you in all probability seen by wanting beneath, I additionally take time to reply all of the questions posted within the feedback – and there’s fairly a little bit of element in there as properly.
In case you’re purchasing for the Polar Pacer Professional or another accent gadgets, please think about using the affiliate hyperlinks beneath! As an Amazon Affiliate I earn from qualifying purchases. It doesn’t price you something additional, however your purchases assist assist this web site lots. Much more, in case you use Backcountry.com or Aggressive Bicycle owner with coupon code DCRAINMAKER, first time customers save 15% on relevant merchandise!
Here is just a few different variants or sibling merchandise which might be price contemplating:
And at last, right here’s a useful listing of equipment that work properly with this unit (and a few that I confirmed within the evaluate). Given the unit pairs with nearly any Bluetooth Good sport sensors, you should utilize absolutely anything although.
And naturally – you’ll be able to all the time sign-up to be a DCR Supporter! That will get you an ad-free DCR, entry to the DCR Quarantine Nook video collection full of behind the scenes tidbits…and it additionally makes you superior. And being superior is what it’s all about!
Thanks for studying! And as all the time, be happy to submit feedback or questions within the feedback part beneath, I’ll be joyful to try to reply them as rapidly as doable. And lastly, in case you felt this evaluate was helpful – I all the time admire suggestions within the feedback beneath. Thanks!
[ad_2]