[ad_1]
Model-new to the market in March 2022, the Honor Magic4 Final comes filled with options befitting a tool in our Extremely-Premium section ($800 and better). On this evaluate, we check out the way it carried out in our complete array of Show checks.
Key show specs:
- 6.8-inch OLED display screen
- Decision: 2848 x 1312 pixels (460 ppi)
- Refresh charge: 120 Hz
- Most brightness: 1000 cd/m2
About DXOMARK Show checks: For scoring and evaluation in our smartphone and different show evaluations, DXOMARK engineers carry out quite a lot of goal and perceptual checks underneath managed lab and real-life situations. This text highlights a very powerful outcomes of our testing. Notice that we consider show attributes utilizing solely the system’s built-in show {hardware} and its nonetheless picture (gallery) and video apps at their default settings. (For in-depth details about how we consider smartphone and different shows, take a look at our articles, “How DXOMARK checks show high quality” and “A more in-depth have a look at DXOMARK Show testing.”)
Take a look at abstract
Honor Magic4 Final
95
show
72
Apple iPhone 13 Professional Max
Finest: Apple iPhone 13 Professional Max (76)
91
Honor Magic4 Final
84
Samsung Galaxy S22 Extremely (Exynos)
Finest: Samsung Galaxy S22 Extremely (Exynos) (91)
81
Huawei P40 Professional
Finest: Huawei P40 Professional (87)
73
OnePlus 9
Finest: OnePlus 9 (85)
84
Apple iPhone 13 Professional Max
Finest: Apple iPhone 13 Professional Max (86)
3rd
1. Apple iPhone 13 Professional Max
99
4. Samsung Galaxy S22 Extremely (Exynos)
93
7. Samsung Galaxy S22 (Exynos)
92
8. Samsung Galaxy S21 Extremely 5G (Exynos)
91
10. Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G (Snapdragon)
90
10. Samsung Galaxy Note20 Extremely 5G (Snapdragon)
90
14. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
89
14. Samsung Galaxy Note20 Extremely 5G (Exynos)
89
21. Apple iPhone 12 Professional Max
88
26. Samsung Galaxy S20 Extremely 5G
87
33. Oppo Reno6 Professional 5G (Snapdragon)
86
38. Apple iPhone 11 Professional Max
84
50. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
79
56. Microsoft Floor Duo
74
64. Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Professional
61
66. Lenovo Legion Telephone 2 Professional
53
3rd
1. Apple iPhone 13 Professional Max
99
4. Samsung Galaxy S22 Extremely (Exynos)
93
6. Samsung Galaxy S21 Extremely 5G (Exynos)
91
8. Samsung Galaxy Note20 Extremely 5G (Snapdragon)
90
10. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
89
10. Samsung Galaxy Note20 Extremely 5G (Exynos)
89
14. Apple iPhone 12 Professional Max
88
18. Samsung Galaxy S20 Extremely 5G
87
23. Apple iPhone 11 Professional Max
84
26. Microsoft Floor Duo
74
29. Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Professional
61
Execs
-
Excellent shade rendering
-
Brightness effectively fitted to low-light and indoor situations
-
Easy response to ambient lighting modifications
- Almost flicker-free OLED display screen
Cons
- Lack of contact smoothness in each use case
- Sturdy aliasing seen when enjoying video video games
- Many body drops seen when beginning movies
With an total rating of 95, the Honor Magic4 Final places in a powerful efficiency for a lot of Show protocol attributes, with particularly good shade rendering that places it on the high of the charts as of this writing. Its solely actual downside is for contact, the place it doesn’t really feel easy in any of DXOMARK’s use circumstances.
Analyses and comparisons
The DXOMARK Show total rating of 95 for the Honor Magic4 Final is derived from its scores throughout six attributes: readability, shade, video, movement, contact, and artifacts. On this part, we’ll take a better have a look at these show high quality sub-scores and clarify what they imply for the person, and we’ll examine the Honor Magic4 Final’s efficiency in a number of areas towards two of its opponents, the Samsung Galaxy S22 Extremely (Exynos) and the Apple iPhone 13 Professional Max.
Readability (72)
DXOMARK makes use of the system’s gallery app to indicate static (nonetheless picture) content material when measuring the system’s show for brightness, distinction, gamma, and blue mild impression, and so on.
The comparability charts under present the Honor’s efficiency vs. the competitors at 0 lux (low mild) and at 30,000 lux (broad daylight):
Brightness vs Distinction comparability (0 Lux)
Brightness vs Distinction comparability (30 000 Lux)
The brightness of the Honor Magic4 Final is effectively fitted to low-light situations:
Readability in low mild, from left to proper: Honor Magic4 Final, Samsung Galaxy S22 Extremely (Exynos), Apple iPhone 13 Professional Max
Photograph credit score: DXOMARK. For illustration solely.
Additional, the Honor system is readable in indoor situations, and is brighter than each the S22 Extremely and iPhone 13 Professional Max within the examples under:
Readability indoors, from left to proper: Honor Magic4 Final, Samsung Galaxy S22 Extremely (Exynos), Apple iPhone 13 Professional Max
Photograph credit score: DXOMARK. For illustration solely.
Nevertheless, it’s much less readable in shady out of doors situations than the competitors…
Readability outdoor in shade, from left to proper: Honor Magic4 Final, Samsung Galaxy S22 Extremely (Exynos), Apple iPhone 13 Professional Max
Photograph credit score: DXOMARK. For illustration solely.
…and is tough to learn underneath daylight.
Readability underneath daylight, from left to proper: Honor Magic4 Final, Samsung Galaxy S22 Extremely (Exynos), Apple iPhone 13 Professional Max
Photograph credit score: DXOMARK. For illustration solely.
The Honor Magic4 Final’s brightness adaptation is easy when the ambient mild modifications. The system is nearly uniform, with just a few slight non-uniformities seen across the notch. The Honor is snug to learn with the blue mild filter on.
Coloration (91)
DXOMARK makes use of the system’s gallery app to indicate static (nonetheless picture) content material when measuring the system’s show for white level, gamut, uniformity, shade constancy, and blue mild filter impression, and so on.
The Honor Magic4 Final’s superb rendering makes it the present chief for DXOMARK’s shade attribute, with nice colours underneath most viewing situations, together with low mild:
Coloration rendering in low mild, from left to proper: Honor Magic4 Final, Samsung Galaxy S22 Extremely (Exynos), Apple iPhone 13 Professional Max
Photograph credit score: DXOMARK. For illustration solely.
In indoor situations, a slight blue forged is usually seen. However when its opponents’ renderings, the Samsung Galaxy S22 Extremely (Exynos) is extra blue and the Apple iPhone 13 Professional Max reveals a yellow forged.
Coloration rendering indoors, from left to proper: Honor Magic4 Final, Samsung Galaxy S22 Extremely (Exynos), Apple iPhone 13 Professional Max
Photograph credit score: DXOMARK. For illustration solely.
In out of doors situations, the Honor system stays devoted with managed colours. When its opponents, the S22 Extremely is manner oversaturated and the iPhone continues to show a yellow forged.
Coloration rendering underneath daylight, from left to proper: Honor Magic4 Final, Samsung Galaxy S22 Extremely (Exynos), Apple iPhone 13 Professional Max
Photograph credit score: DXOMARK. For illustration solely.
The charts under present the measured shade faithfulness of the Honor Magic4 Final in each the RGB and P3 shade areas at 1000 lux. The additional the tip of an arrow is exterior the circle, the extra noticeable the distinction between the system’s shade rendering and the unique supply materials. The Honor reveals good shade constancy in each shade areas.
Honor Magic4 Final, shade constancy in sRGB shade area at 1000 lux
Honor Magic4 Final, shade constancy in P3 shade area at 1000 lux
The charts under present the Honor’s shade tendencies when held at an angle. Every dot represents a measurement taken at a discrete angle and distance from the system. Dots contained in the inside circle exhibit no shade shift in angle; these between the inside and outer circle have shifts that solely educated consultants will see; however these falling exterior the outer circle are readily noticeable. The Honor Magic4 Final maintains its shade when considered at an angle, particularly when in comparison with its rivals. Its shade shift is troublesome to understand to an untrained eye.
Honor Magic4 Final, shade shift on angle
Samsung Galaxy S22 Extremely (Exynos), shade shift on angle
Apple iPhone 13 Professional Max, shade shift on angle
The Honor system is generally uniform in shade. It shifts to a yellow forged when the BLF is on, however the ensuing forged is just not disturbing.
Video (84)
DXOMARK makes use of the system’s video (or gallery) app to indicate dynamic content material when measuring the system’s show for brightness, distinction, gamma, and shade.
The Honor Magic4 Final’s most brightness is effectively fitted to HDR10 content material. Nevertheless, midtones seem darker than they need to, and darkish tones are lacking some particulars. Colours, together with pores and skin tones, are effectively rendered total.
Video brightness, clockwise from high left: Honor Magic4 Final, Samsung Galaxy S22 Extremely (Exynos), Apple iPhone 13 Professional Max
Photograph credit score: DXOMARK. For illustration solely.
Movement (81)
The Honor Magic4 Final reveals some body mismatches for 30 fps and 60 fps content material, as you may see within the 60 fps SDR video examples under, however no body drops are seen when enjoying video video games.
Samsung Galaxy S22 Extremely (Exynos)
The system manages movement blur effectively, however it stutters when resuming video playback.
Contact (73)
The Honor system is correct and has good reactivity when enjoying video video games (<65 ms). Nevertheless, the system lacks smoothness in each use case.
Artifacts (84)
The Honor Magic4 Final reveals virtually noflicker, with a PWM frequency of 1920 Hz. That is the very best PWM frequency we’ve seen on an OLED show thus far.
The video under is shot at 2000 fps and displayed at 5 fps (400 occasions slower than actuality). We are able to see that to reduce the flickering impact, the Magic4 Final will increase the variety of vibrant and darkish bands. Compared, the S22 Extremely (Exynos) has only a few bands and an vital luminance amplitude, making the flickering extra noticeable. The Apple iPhone 13 Professional Max’s flickering is just not as minimal because the Honor’s, however not as noticeable because the Samsung’s.
Flicker comparability, from left: Honor Magic4 Final, Samsung Galaxy S22 Extremely (Exynos), Apple iPhone 13 Professional Max
Furthermore, the system doesn’t reply to ghost touches. Judder is effectively managed, however there are body mismatches at 24 and 30 fps, although none are seen at 60 fps. Sturdy aliasing is noticeable when enjoying video video games.
Honor Magic4 Final, aliasing
Samsung Galaxy S22 Extremely (Exynos), aliasing
Apple iPhone 13 Professional Max, aliasing
[ad_2]
