[ad_1]
The Honor Magic4 Final is the Chinese language model’s flagship machine, that includes top-end specs throughout, together with a Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 5G chipset. The rear digital camera includes a 1/1.12″ 50MP sensor, one of many largest now we have seen on a cellphone and the identical measurement as on final yr’s Mi 11 Extremely, within the stabilized main module. The ultra-wide and tele modules each include a 1/2.0″ 64MP sensor and provide a focal size vary from 11mm to 90mm equal. The digital camera additionally includes a flicker detection sensor that’s used to information the publicity system by capturing ambient mild and that helps to forestall banding artifacts. A spectrum-enhanced digital camera (not activated but with the examined firmware model) captures extra mild data from the near-infrared a part of the sunshine spectrum which reinforces the readability and dynamic vary of photos in outside circumstances.
The digital camera additionally makes use of fusion algorithms to enhance texture on the heart of the body when tele zooming. As well as, tele high quality is improved by means of combining optical picture stabilization (OIS) and AI super-decision algorithms.
In video mode the digital camera can file 4K video at 30 frames per second. In a later firmware model (that now we have not but examined) HDR10+ recording will probably be obtainable in addition to a standalone AI chipset which may assist improve texture and noise as properly the brightness in low mild movies recorded at 4K decision and 30 frames per second.
Let’s see how the Honor Magic4 Final digital camera carried out within the DXOMARK Digital camera checks.
Key digital camera specs:
- Major: 50 MP 1/1.12″ sensor, 1.4μm pixels, 23mm equal focal size, f/1.6-aperture lens, OIS, PDAF, Laser-AF
- Extremely-wide: 64MP 1/2.0″ sensor, 0.7μm pixels, 11mm equal focal size, f/2.2-aperture lens, PDAF
- Tele: 64MP 1/2.0″ sensor, 0.7μm pixels, 90mm equal focal size, f/3.5-aperture lens, OIS, PDAF
- LED flash
- Flicker sensor
- Spectrum-enhanced sensor
- 4K at 30fps, 1080p as much as 60fps (examined at 4K/30fps)
About DXOMARK Digital camera checks: For scoring and evaluation in our smartphone digital camera critiques, DXOMARK engineers seize and consider over 3000 check photos and greater than 2.5 hours of video each in managed lab environments and in pure indoor and outside scenes, utilizing the digital camera’s default settings. This text is designed to focus on an important outcomes of our testing. For extra details about the DXOMARK Digital camera check protocol, click on right here. Extra particulars on how we rating smartphone cameras can be found right here.
Take a look at abstract
Honor Magic4 Final
146
digital camera
111
Honor Magic4 Final
105
Apple iPhone 13 Professional Max
Greatest: Apple iPhone 13 Professional Max (107)
106
Asus Smartphone for Snapdragon Insiders
Greatest: Asus Smartphone for Snapdragon Insiders (109)
106
Xiaomi Mi 11
Greatest: Xiaomi Mi 11 (111)
102
Honor Magic4 Final
71
Google Pixel 6
Greatest: Google Pixel 6 (77)
80
Huawei Mate 40 Professional+
Greatest: Huawei Mate 40 Professional+ (82)
75
Huawei P50 Professional
Greatest: Huawei P50 Professional (80)
64
Apple iPhone 13 Professional Max
Greatest: Apple iPhone 13 Professional Max (80)
140
Honor Magic4 Final
58
Honor Magic4 Final
101
Apple iPhone 13 Professional Max
Greatest: Apple iPhone 13 Professional Max (118)
107
Honor Magic4 Final
102
Apple iPhone 13 Professional Max
Greatest: Apple iPhone 13 Professional Max (109)
91
Oppo Reno6 Professional 5G (Snapdragon)
Greatest: Oppo Reno6 Professional 5G (Snapdragon) (99)
104
Apple iPhone 13 Professional Max
Greatest: Apple iPhone 13 Professional Max (105)
80
Oppo Discover X2 Professional
Greatest: Oppo Discover X2 Professional (94)
102
Vivo X70 Professional+
Greatest: Vivo X70 Professional+ (103)
1st
5. Apple iPhone 13 Professional Max
137
10. Asus Smartphone for Snapdragon Insiders
133
14. Samsung Galaxy S22 Extremely (Exynos)
131
14. Vivo X70 Professional (MediaTek)
131
18. Apple iPhone 12 Professional Max
130
25. Samsung Galaxy S22+ (Exynos)
126
25. Samsung Galaxy S22 (Exynos)
126
25. Samsung Galaxy S20 Extremely 5G (Exynos)
126
29. Apple iPhone 11 Professional Max
124
29. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
124
32. Samsung Galaxy S21 Extremely 5G (Snapdragon)
123
35. Oppo Reno6 Professional 5G (Snapdragon)
121
35. Samsung Galaxy S21 Extremely 5G (Exynos)
121
37. Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G (Snapdragon)
120
37. Samsung Galaxy Note20 Extremely 5G (Exynos)
120
37. Samsung Galaxy Note20 (Exynos)
120
37. Samsung Galaxy Be aware 20 (Exynos)
120
37. Vivo X60 Professional 5G (Snapdragon)
120
45. Samsung Galaxy S21+ 5G (Snapdragon)
119
45. Samsung Galaxy S21 5G (Snapdragon)
119
48. Vivo X60 Professional 5G (Exynos)
118
52. Samsung Galaxy Note20 Extremely 5G (Snapdragon)
117
56. Samsung Galaxy S21+ 5G (Exynos)
116
56. Samsung Galaxy S21 5G (Exynos)
116
56. Samsung Galaxy Be aware 10+ 5G (Exynos)
116
60. Samsung Galaxy S20 FE (Exynos)
115
67. Samsung Galaxy Note20 (Snapdragon)
112
77. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold2 5G
109
77. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2
109
79. Xiaomi Redmi K40 Professional+
108
86. Xiaomi Redmi Be aware 10 Professional
106
94. Apple iPhone SE (2020)
103
97. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
102
102. Xiaomi Redmi Be aware 10S
92
103. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G
88
104. Samsung Galaxy A51 5G
87
1st
5. Apple iPhone 13 Professional Max
137
10. Asus Smartphone for Snapdragon Insiders
133
13. Samsung Galaxy S22 Extremely (Exynos)
131
16. Apple iPhone 12 Professional Max
130
21. Samsung Galaxy S22+ (Exynos)
126
21. Samsung Galaxy S20 Extremely 5G (Exynos)
126
24. Apple iPhone 11 Professional Max
124
24. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
124
27. Samsung Galaxy S21 Extremely 5G (Snapdragon)
123
28. Samsung Galaxy S21 Extremely 5G (Exynos)
121
29. Samsung Galaxy Note20 Extremely 5G (Exynos)
120
29. Samsung Galaxy Note20 (Exynos)
120
29. Samsung Galaxy Be aware 20 (Exynos)
120
32. Samsung Galaxy S21+ 5G (Snapdragon)
119
34. Samsung Galaxy Note20 Extremely 5G (Snapdragon)
117
36. Samsung Galaxy S21+ 5G (Exynos)
116
36. Samsung Galaxy Be aware 10+ 5G (Exynos)
116
39. Samsung Galaxy Note20 (Snapdragon)
112
43. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold2 5G
109
43. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2
109
Professionals
- Good publicity and vast dynamic vary
- Quick and constant autofocus
- Low noise in brilliant mild and indoors
- Good white steadiness
- Good element in any respect tele settings, particularly medium vary
- Good publicity and low noise on ultra-wide digital camera
- Correct publicity and good texture/noise trade-off in evening photographs
- Good topic isolation in bokeh mode
- Efficient video stabilization
- Good shade and white steadiness in video mode
- Good video publicity, particularly indoors and in low mild
- Low noise and excessive element in video
Cons
- Low distinction in some HDR scenes
- Some native lack of element within the shadows
- Muted colours in backlit scenes
- Fusion artifacts on tele and ultra-wide cameras
- Barely restricted dynamic vary in video, spotlight clipping
- Video artifacts, together with hue shift and ghosting
- Sharpness variations between video frames in low mild
- White steadiness instabilities in video
With a DXOMARK Digital camera rating of 146 the Honor Magic4 Final is the brand new No. 1 in our rating, due to excellent nonetheless picture efficiency throughout a number of use instances, equivalent to portraits, evening photographs, cityscapes, motion photos and zooming. The Honor additionally does very properly within the video class, with good element seize, and really environment friendly stabilization. Total video efficiency is on par with its primary rivals.
When taking pictures pictures, the digital camera provides a large dynamic vary whereas sustaining nice distinction. Mixed with the second-best texture/noise compromise that now we have seen thus far, this permits for glorious element seize in each portrait and panorama photos. The autofocus with its well-implemented zero shutter lag makes the Honor a superb decide for motion photos as photos are captured just about instantaneously when the shutter is triggered. As well as, transferring topics are freed from movement blur, though some slight fusion artifacts might be seen.
The Honor Magic4 Final can be a wonderful device on the subject of evening images, rating second within the Night time class. Correct colours and good publicity make for gorgeous nightscapes and evening portraits are rendered properly, even with out flash use. Element seize is nice in low mild and movement blur is managed properly.
This Honor Magic4 Final image has a large dynamic vary, good shade, and distinction as properly very excessive ranges of element and really low noise.
The Honor can be top-of-the-line telephones now we have examined thus far for zooming in or out. With its 11mm equal ultra-wide digital camera, it provides the widest discipline of view of any digital camera now we have examined thus far. Regardless of the vast lens, distortion and anamorphosis are properly beneath management, making the machine a superb decide for wide-angle portraits. As well as, the digital camera captures higher element than the competitors at 16mm, which is the default ultra-wide setting. That is achieved by fusing picture knowledge from the ultra-wide and first cameras. On the draw back, some fusion artifacts within the form of a neighborhood lack of element can typically turn out to be noticeable. However goal publicity and shade rendering are normally correct. White steadiness is nice in all circumstances.
The Honor Magic4 Final can be excellent for tele zooming, due to the mixture of a 64MP 90mm equal tele module with plenty of picture fusion options that end in glorious element and a large dynamic vary in any respect tele zoom settings. At shut vary, ranges of element are excessive and on par with the direct rivals, whereas capturing numerous dynamic vary. The excessive ranges of element are doubtless defined by AI fusion algorithms that enhance wonderful element in an important areas of the body. However this expertise comes at a value as a result of a variation within the stage of captured element is commonly noticeable throughout the body.
Medium vary (roughly 3.5x) is the place the Honor Magic4 Final actually shines. Element may be very excessive in comparison with the direct competitors. Dynamic vary is vast, and shade rendering and goal publicity are nice in all examined circumstances, together with low mild.
Comparability: Focal lengths of flagship cellphone digital camera modules
The Honor Magic4 Final doesn’t obtain a high rating for Video, however it’s nonetheless a wonderful cellphone for recording transferring footage. Colours are correct and vivid, particularly in brilliant mild and low mild, delivering an general very nice look. Nice element is fairly properly preserved, and general the feel/noise trade-off for video is on par with the competitors. Dynamic vary is barely extra restricted than on the perfect at school however the digital camera maintains good publicity, even in tough backlit video scenes.
Picture
The Honor Magic4 Final achieves a Picture rating of 153. On this part, we take a better take a look at every sub-attribute and evaluate picture high quality in opposition to opponents.
In these checks, we analyze goal publicity, distinction, and dynamic vary, together with repeatability throughout a sequence of photos. Assessments are undertaken in a variety of sunshine circumstances, together with backlit scenes and low mild right down to 1 lux. The rating is derived from plenty of goal measurements within the lab and perceptual evaluation of real-life photos.
The Honor Magic4 Final delivers very excessive distinction entropy values in all check circumstances. Distinction entropy is a measurement of the amount of knowledge (when it comes to ranges of grey) contained in a given a part of the scene. When taking pictures handheld, the Honor normally manages to seize extra data in areas close to saturation than its rivals. Efficiency is constant throughout all circumstances, even the place the comparability cameras wrestle, for instance, 100 lux TL84 with a brightness distinction of EV7.
This graph exhibits the typical entropy for a number of HDR lighting circumstances. Distinction entropy (measured in bits) is a measure of dynamic vary and is computed on the grey patches on the HDR charts throughout the autofocus HDR setup. A price decrease than 2 is unacceptable.
Some cameras tend to barely underexpose with a purpose to shield the highlights in a picture. This isn’t the case for the Honor, which delivers constant goal publicity and excessive entropy values on the identical time. That is true even for tough high-contrast and low-light circumstances.
This graph exhibits the lightness of the 18% patch of the deadleaves chart within the autofocus HDR setup DXOMARK AFHDR setup for a number of HDR lighting circumstances.
On this backlit scene, goal publicity on the face is correct and a large dynamic vary ensures there’s good element within the brilliant sky within the background, with solely very slight spotlight clipping. The Xiaomi Mi 11 Extremely utterly clips the sky and a few branches of the background tree and captures barely low distinction. Ideally for this type of scene good pores and skin tones and good distinction are maintained and the Honor strikes an excellent compromise on this respect. Face publicity may be very barely decrease than on the P50 Professional, however general each the Honor and Huawei ship superb publicity.
Honor Magic4 Final, good face publicity, inaccurate pores and skin tones
Huawei P50 Professional, good face publicity, clipping within the sky, inaccurate pores and skin tones
Xiaomi Mi 11 Extremely, good face publicity, clipping, inaccurate pores and skin tones
In low mild, the Honor normally delivers correct publicity and a dynamic vary that’s barely wider than on opponents. Plenty of element is retained in shadow and particularly spotlight areas of the body. The P50 Professional has a really related dynamic vary however spotlight clipping is barely extra seen. Though the Mi 11 Extremely has a darker publicity, it exhibits extra spotlight clipping.
Honor Magic4 Final, good publicity and vast dynamic vary, minimal clipping
Huawei P50 Professional, good publicity and vast dynamic vary
Xiaomi Mi 11 Extremely, darker publicity however extra clipping
Shade
Honor Magic4 Final
105
107
Apple iPhone 13 Professional Max
Greatest: Apple iPhone 13 Professional Max (107)
In these checks, we analyze shade rendering, pores and skin tones, white steadiness, and shade shading, together with repeatability throughout a sequence of photos. The rating is derived from plenty of goal measurements within the lab and perceptual evaluation of real-life photos.
In brilliant mild, the Honor’s shade rendering is correct with nice saturation. The P50 Professional has some points with the sky, which is commonly rendered too blue in cloudy circumstances. The Honor tends to render skies very precisely, however cool casts might be barely noticeable in cloudy climate or in high-contrast scenes. Xiaomi Mi 11 Extremely photos usually present a slight pink forged. The Huawei P50 Professional is probably the most impartial on this regard.
Honor Magic4 Final, good shade, and correct white steadiness
Huawei P50 Professional, good white steadiness, however sky is rendered blue on this scene though it’s truly grey
Xiaomi Mi 11 Extremely, good white steadiness, shade of grass barely inaccurate
When capturing indoor scenes, slight inexperienced and orange casts might be noticeable, particularly in backlit high-contrast scenes. On this pattern, there’s an orange forged seen, and pores and skin tones look too pink. However pores and skin tones are inaccurate on the comparability units as properly. Be aware that the Honor delivers a wider dynamic vary right here than the Huawei, which clips the background.
Honor Magic4 Final, robust white steadiness forged, inaccurate pores and skin tones
Huawei P50 Professional, barely inaccurate shade rendering
Xiaomi Mi 11 Extremely, slight pink forged, inaccurate pores and skin tones
Autofocus
Honor Magic4 Final
106
109
Asus Smartphone for Snapdragon Insiders
Greatest: Asus Smartphone for Snapdragon Insiders (109)
In these checks, we analyze autofocus accuracy and taking pictures time, together with repeatability, within the lab. We check focus failures, depth of discipline, and monitoring of transferring topics utilizing perceptual evaluation of real-life photos.
The Honor Magic4 Final makes use of Zero Shutter Lag (ZSL) expertise, which permits for picture seize precisely on the identical time the shutter is triggered, with none delay. To realize this, photos are constantly buffered whereas the digital camera app is open. The autofocus may be very constant in all circumstances. This graph exhibits autofocus-reaction efficiency in difficult low mild. The nearer collectively the factors are, the extra secure the autofocus. The farther aside the factors are from each other signifies autofocus instability. The Honor does very properly, with a brief focus delay and excessive acutance in all photographs. The comparability units are a bit of extra unstable when it comes to each delay (Huawei P50 Professional) and acutance (Xiaomi Mi 11 Extremely).
This graph plots edge acutance in opposition to taking pictures time measured on the AFHDR arrange on a sequence of images. All footage are taken at 5 lux with tungsten illuminant, handheld, 500ms after the goal is defocused. Edge acutance is measured on the 4 edges of the deadleaves, taking pictures time is measured on an LED Common Timer.
On this tough backlit scene, the photographer triggers the shutter when the mannequin passes by means of the door body. On the Honor, the picture has been captured at that exact second, due to Zero Shutter Lag doing its job, even in tough circumstances and for a portrait shot the place face detection performs an necessary position. The topic is in focus and no movement blur is seen.
Honor Magic4 Final, quick seize after shot is triggered, topic in focus, no movement blur
Huawei P50 Professional, quick seize after shot is triggered, topic in focus, no movement blur
Xiaomi Mi 11 Extremely, quick seize after shot is triggered, movement blur on topic
Because of the massive picture sensor (for a smartphone) measurement in Honor’s main digital camera and the vast aperture, depth of discipline is, at the very least on paper, fairly shallow. Nonetheless, the Magic4 Final makes use of synthetic intelligence (AI) to establish and sharpen partially blurred topics within the background, related (however not fairly as polished) to what we’ve seen beforehand on the Mi 11 Extremely. This fashion, a number of topics in several focus planes might be rendered sharp.
Honor Magic4 Final, depth of discipline
Honor Magic4 Final, crop: good element on foreground topic, lack of element on background topic
Huawei P50 Professional, depth of discipline
Huawei P50 Professional, crop: good element on each topics
Xiaomi Mi 11 Extremely, depth of discipline
Xiaomi Mi 11 Extremely, crop: good element on each topics
Texture
Honor Magic4 Final
106
111
Xiaomi Mi 11
Greatest: Xiaomi Mi 11 (111)
In these checks we analyze texture on faces and objects, together with objects in movement, in a spread of sunshine circumstances, utilizing a number of lab check setups and perceptual evaluation of real-life photos.
The Magic4 Final captures excessive ranges of element in all circumstances in comparison with its rivals, particularly when taking pictures handheld in low mild. Outcomes are fairly related between handheld and tripod-based taking pictures. On the comparability units, the variations are extra pronounced.
This graph exhibits DMC element preservation in opposition to the sunshine stage (in lux) for handheld and tripod-mounted taking pictures.
DMC element preservation metric is an AI-based texture evaluation educated on three chosen crops of our DXOMARK chart. The nearer the worth is to 100, the upper is element preservation.
In low mild, the Honor Magic4 Final captures even higher wonderful element than the comparability telephones, that are each among the many greatest telephones now we have examined.
Honor Magic4 Final, low mild texture
Honor Magic4 Final, crop: wonderful element is properly preserved
Huawei P50 Professional, low mild texture
Huawei P50 Professional, crop: lack of wonderful element
Xiaomi Mi 11 Extremely, low mild texture
Xiaomi Mi 11 Extremely, crop: lack of wonderful element
In brilliant outside mild, wonderful element may be very properly preserved. The extent of element is barely higher than the Huawei P50 Professional, and the Honor additionally applies barely stronger sharpening. On this panorama scene, the Xiaomi Mi 11 Extremely delivers the perfect wonderful element among the many rival cameras.
Honor Magic4 Final, outside texture
Honor Magic4 Final, crop: good wonderful element
Huawei P50 Professional, outside texture
Huawei P50 Professional, crop: good wonderful element
Xiaomi Mi 11 Extremely, outside texture
Xiaomi Mi 11 Extremely, crop: superb wonderful element
In these checks, we analyze noise on faces and objects, together with objects in movement, in a spread of sunshine circumstances, utilizing a number of lab check setups and perceptual evaluation of real-life photos.
The Honor digital camera normally retains picture noise very properly beneath management and general the Magic4 Final’s efficiency is near its flagship rivals and higher than the iPhone 13 Professional Max in all circumstances.
This graph exhibits visible noise in opposition to the sunshine stage (in lux) when the digital camera is handheld. The visible noise metric is the imply of visible noise measurement on all patches of the deadleaves chart within the AFHDR setup.
Noise ranges are very low, even in high-contrast circumstances. On this low mild scene (5 lux), hardly any noise is seen.
Honor Magic4 Final, low mild noise
Honor Magic4 Final, crop: noise properly beneath management
Huawei P50 Professional, low mild noise
Huawei P50 Professional, crop: chroma noise in areas of plain shade
Xiaomi Mi 11 Extremely, low mild noise
Bokeh
Huawei P50 Professional
Greatest: Huawei P50 Professional (80)
For these checks, we swap to the digital camera’s bokeh or portrait mode and analyze depth estimation, bokeh form, blur gradient, and repeatability, in addition to all different basic picture high quality attributes talked about above. The rating is derived from perceptual evaluation of real-life photos.
We examined aperture mode on the Honor, and in bokeh mode, the machine applies blur to the foreground, making for a sensible impact. Depth estimation is not so good as on the P50 Professional however is just like the Xiaomi, and is general correct. Background blur is robust, just like the Huawei P50 Professional. Compared, the Xiaomi applies much less blur. On the draw back, the blur gradient just isn’t very clean and bokeh photos present a scarcity of wonderful element.
Honor Magic4 Final, bokeh mode
Honor Magic4 Final, crop: glorious depth estimation, robust blur, abrupt blur transition, lack of wonderful element
Huawei P50 Professional, bokeh mode
Huawei P50 Professional, crop: glorious depth estimation, even on wonderful element, robust blur and good gradient, good wonderful element
Xiaomi Mi 11 Extremely, bokeh mode
Xiaomi Mi 11 Extremely, crop: glorious depth estimation, good gradient, fairly good wonderful element
Night time
Huawei Mate 40 Professional+
Greatest: Huawei Mate 40 Professional+ (82)
In these checks, we shoot a number of photos in pitch-black darkness in addition to with metropolis lights within the background offering some illumination. We shoot pattern photos with the digital camera at default settings in each flash-auto and flash-off modes. We analyze all picture high quality attributes however we pay explicit consideration to publicity, autofocus, and shade. We don’t check evening modes that must be activated manually.
On evening portrait photographs just like the one under, the Honor Magic4 Final doesn’t set off the flash when set to flash-auto mode. This enables for a extra even publicity and subsequently extra pure rendering of the scene. Nonetheless, taking pictures in low mild and not using a flash is difficult to any digital camera and may end up in movement blur and ghosting results. The Honor masters the problem, although. Even with out triggering the flash, the topic and background publicity are good. As well as, wonderful element is best than on the rival telephones, and there’s no movement blur on the face. Shade rendering is normally correct, and general, the Honor beats the competitors in most evening scenes.
Honor Magic4 Final, flash-auto
Honor Magic4 Final, crop: good topic and background publicity, good element on topic
Huawei P50 Professional, flash-auto
Huawei P50 Professional, crop: good topic and background publicity, lack of wonderful element on topic
Xiaomi Mi 11 Extremely, flash-auto
Xiaomi Mi 11 Extremely, crop: good topic and background publicity, lack of wonderful element on topic, hue shift on face
With the flash pressured off, publicity and shade are correct in panorama scenes. Dynamic vary is wider and element is best than the rivals. Noise is properly beneath management, however shade quantization is seen within the sky. Total, the Honor is the perfect machine now we have examined thus far for evening photographs with out flash.
Honor Magic4 Final, flash-off
Honor Magic4 Final, crop: good wonderful element
Huawei P50 Professional, flash-off
Huawei P50 Professional, crop: lack of wonderful element
Xiaomi Mi 11 Extremely, flash-off
Xiaomi Mi 11 Extremely, crop: lack of wonderful element
Artifacts
Google Pixel 6
Greatest: Google Pixel 6 (77)
In these checks, we test photos for optical artifacts equivalent to vignetting, flare, lens softness within the corners, distortion, and chromatic aberrations, in addition to for processing artifacts equivalent to ghosting and fusion errors, hue shift, and ringing.
Picture artifacts are properly managed on the Magic4 Final. Nonetheless, our testers noticed some points, equivalent to fusion artifacts. That is very true for wonderful element round topics in high-contrast scenes. Nonetheless, it’s honest to say that we solely noticed the problems proven right here in roughly ten photos out of the hundreds of samples we shoot for a check like this.
Honor Magic4 Final, fusion artifacts
Honor Magic4 Final, crop: unnatural rendering of hair in some areas
Huawei P50 Professional, fusion artifacts
Huawei P50 Professional, crop: barely unnatural rendering of hair
Xiaomi Mi 11 Extremely, fusion artifacts
Xiaomi Mi 11 Extremely, crop: hair appears pure
Fusion artifacts are seen on this mild reflection on the wall. There’s additionally robust shade quantization on this pattern.
Honor Magic4 Final, artifacts
Honor Magic4 Final, fusion artifacts, shade quantization
Preview
Apple iPhone 13 Professional Max
Greatest: Apple iPhone 13 Professional Max (80)
In these checks, we analyze the picture high quality of the preview picture and the variations between preview photos and captured photos, notably when it comes to publicity, dynamic vary, and bokeh impact. We additionally test the smoothness of the field-of-view adjustments within the preview picture when zooming with each buttons or when utilizing the pinch-zoom gesture.
The Honor’s preview picture exhibits some variations to the ultimate seize. Dynamic vary of the preview is rather more restricted than in seize, with increased ranges of spotlight clipping. Goal publicity is normally fairly shut between preview and seize, and in bokeh scenes, the blur impact is correctly utilized to the preview picture. Blur depth is a bit of decrease than in seize.
Honor Magic4 Final, preview: seen distinction to seize when it comes to spotlight clipping; bokeh simulation is properly finished in preview, however blur is barely decrease than on seize.
Honor Magic4 Final, seize
Zoom
The Honor Magic4 Final achieves a Zoom rating of 107. The Zoom rating consists of the tele and vast sub-scores. On this part, we take a better take a look at how these sub-scores have been achieved and evaluate zoom picture high quality in opposition to the opponents.
In these checks, we analyze the efficiency of the ultra-wide digital camera at a number of focal lengths from 12 to twenty mm. We take a look at all picture high quality attributes, however we pay explicit consideration to such artifacts as chromatic aberrations, lens softness, and distortion.
The Honor’s ultra-wide focal size of 11mm is the widest in our check database. This enables the digital camera to seize extra parts of the scene than its rivals. For portrait photographs, the digital camera makes use of picture fusion to enhance element on faces. Nonetheless, the fusion algorithms may typically trigger a neighborhood lack of texture. Goal publicity is sweet, and shade rendering, in addition to white steadiness, are normally correct. Nonetheless, on some events, blue shade casts can have a unfavourable impression on pores and skin tone rendering, like on this pattern.
Honor Magic4 Final, ultra-wide 13mm
Honor Magic4 Final, crop: good wonderful element on face
Huawei P50 Professional, ultra-wide 13mm
Huawei P50 Professional, crop: lack of wonderful element on topic
Xiaomi Mi 11 Extremely, ultra-wide 13mm
Xiaomi Mi 11 Extremely, crop: lack of wonderful element on topic
The Honor Magic4 Final makes use of picture fusion on its ultra-wide digital camera with a purpose to push element. On this 18mm scene, wonderful element is best preserved than on the rival cameras. Noise is properly beneath management, and the Honor provides a significantly better texture/noise trade-off than the competitors. Aliasing is commonly seen in areas of high-frequency patterns.
Honor Magic4 Final, ultra-wide 18mm
Honor Magic4 Final, superb wonderful element, low noise
Huawei P50 Professional, ultra-wide 18mm
Huawei P50 Professional, good wonderful element, low noise
Xiaomi Mi 11 Extremely, ultra-wide 18mm
Xiaomi Mi 11 Extremely, crop: good wonderful element, low noise
In these checks, we analyze all picture high quality attributes at focal lengths from roughly 40 to 300 mm, paying explicit consideration to texture and element. The rating is derived from plenty of goal measurements within the lab and perceptual evaluation of real-life photos.
The graph under exhibits the sunshine assortment functionality of a number of units throughout all equal focal lengths. Gentle assortment is an estimation of the quantity of sunshine that the sensor can seize in a single publicity. It’s outlined as follows, with S being the efficient space of the sensor and Fn the aperture. The upper the worth, the upper the variety of photons that arrive on the sensor.
We see lowering curves within the graph as a result of as we body to a given discipline of view (or equal focal size), the efficient sensor areas lower. The vertical purple dotted line marks the default focal size of the Honor’s ultra-wide digital camera. The graph exhibits that, at the very least on paper, the Honor Magic4 Final is able to capturing extra mild than its opponents in a single publicity of the first sensor. At ultra-wide and lengthy tele settings solely the Xiaomi Mi 11 Extremely collects extra photons. Please additionally word that the Honor Magic4 Final provides an as much as 100x digital zoom possibility for these actually lengthy tele photographs. 
Comparability: mild assortment functionality throughout focal lengths
At brief vary, tele element may be very excessive on the heart of the body. To realize this, the digital camera captures this type of picture utilizing its tele digital camera after which fills the outer areas of the body with picture knowledge from the first digital camera. In these outer areas, a noticeable drop intimately might be noticed. For brief-range tele photographs, the Xiaomi Mi 11 Extremely is, subsequently, a better option.
Honor Magic4 Final, short-range tele
Honor Magic4 Final, crop: good element at heart however fusion artifacts
Huawei P50 Professional, short-range tele
Huawei P50 Professional, crop: lack of wonderful element however constant texture
Xiaomi Mi 11 Extremely, short-range tele
Xiaomi Mi 11 Extremely, crop: lack of element however constant texture
Because of its 90mm tele module together with an environment friendly element enhancement algorithm, the Honor Magic4 Final manages to render higher texture than its rivals at medium vary tele. Goal publicity is normally good, and dynamic vary is as equally vast because the Huawei P50 Professional. Colours are good.
Honor Magic4 Final, medium-range tele
Honor Magic4 Final, crop: superb element
Huawei P50 Professional, medium-range tele
Huawei P50 Professional, crop: lack of wonderful element
Xiaomi Mi 11 Extremely, medium-range tele
Xiaomi Mi 11 Extremely, crop: lack of wonderful element
On the Magic4 Final, measured decision may be very excessive in any respect focal lengths and normally increased than on the competitors.
Tele zoom decision comparability
Video
In our Video checks, we analyze the identical picture high quality attributes as for nonetheless photos, equivalent to publicity, shade, texture or noise, however we additionally embody such temporal features as velocity, and smoothness and stability of publicity, white steadiness, and autofocus transitions.
NOTE: The pattern video clips on this part are greatest seen at 4K decision.
The Honor Magic4 Final achieves a Video rating of 117. A tool’s general Video rating is derived from its efficiency and outcomes throughout a spread of attributes in the identical means because the Picture rating. On this part, we take a better take a look at these sub-scores and evaluate video picture high quality in opposition to opponents.
Publicity and Distinction
Honor Magic4 Final
101
118
Apple iPhone 13 Professional Max
Greatest: Apple iPhone 13 Professional Max (118)
Video goal publicity is normally correct, and the digital camera provides a dynamic vary that’s good however not among the many best, with nice distinction in backlit scenes. The Huawei P50 Professional exhibits some extra spotlight clipping within the brilliant window, and the Xiaomi Mi 11 Extremely struggles with distinction on the dark-skinned mannequin. Some publicity blinking might be seen, however publicity transitions in altering mild circumstances are fairly clean.
Honor Magic4 Final, good face publicity and vast dynamic vary, good distinction
Huawei P50 Professional, good face publicity, some clipping, good distinction
Xiaomi Mi 11 Extremely, good face publicity, vast dynamic vary, lack of distinction
The Honor’s movies present vast dynamic vary, however in tough backlit scenes, some clipping might be seen. Goal publicity and distinction stay good, although. The iPhone 13 Professional Max has a really vast dynamic vary, minimizing spotlight clipping. The Vivo X70 Professional+ exposes properly, however dynamic vary is extra restricted and distinction might be low.
Honor Magic4 Final, good goal publicity and distinction, clipping
Apple iPhone 13 Professional Max, good goal publicity and distinction, slight clipping, robust flare
Vivo X70 Professional+, good goal publicity, often low distinction, clipping
The Honor Magic4 Final achieves top-of-the-line scores for video shade thus far, due to nice shade in all circumstances. White steadiness is correct, with clean transitions in brilliant mild and beneath indoor lighting. This stated, changes to altering mild circumstances aren’t fairly as good in low mild.
Honor Magic4 Final, good shade and white steadiness
Huawei P50 Professional, good shade and white steadiness
Xiaomi Mi 11 Extremely, good shade and white steadiness
Shade rendering in video mode may be very correct, particularly in brilliant outside circumstances and in low mild. White steadiness is good, and pores and skin tones look higher than on the comparability units.
Honor Magic4 Final, correct shade rendering and pores and skin tones, good white steadiness
Apple iPhone 13 Professional Max, correct shade rendering and pores and skin tones, good white steadiness
Vivo X70 Professional+, robust saturation, good white steadiness
Autofocus
Honor Magic4 Final
102
109
Apple iPhone 13 Professional Max
Greatest: Apple iPhone 13 Professional Max (109)
In video mode, the Honor digital camera focuses properly and does a superb job at monitoring topics. The AF system reacts shortly and precisely to adjustments within the scene, however focus adjustments generally is a little too abrupt.
Honor Magic4 Final, good focus, abrupt transition
Huawei P50 Professional, good focus, clean transition
Xiaomi Mi 11 Extremely, good focus, clean transition
Texture
Oppo Reno6 Professional 5G (Snapdragon)
Greatest: Oppo Reno6 Professional 5G (Snapdragon) (99)
Within the lab, the Honor achieves a excessive stage for each texture and edge acutance. On this graph, you’ll be able to see that in most circumstances, texture acutance is on the same stage as on the flagship rivals.
This graph exhibits texture and edge acutance in opposition to mild stage (in lux). Texture and edge acutance are measured on the deadleaves chart in DXOMARK’s video deadleaves setup.
In brilliant outside mild, wonderful element is rendered fairly properly. Element preservation is barely higher than on the Huawei P50 Professional however not fairly pretty much as good because the Xiaomi Mi 11 Extremely.
Honor Magic4 Final, good wonderful element
Huawei P50 Professional, good wonderful element
Xiaomi Mi 11 Extremely, superb wonderful element
Noise
Honor Magic4 Final
104
105
Apple iPhone 13 Professional Max
Greatest: Apple iPhone 13 Professional Max (105)
In movies, noise may be very properly beneath management in all circumstances, even in difficult high-contrast scenes. The Honor ranks pretty excessive in low mild, the place noise is much less noticeable than on the rivals. On this graph, we will see that noise ranges are very low in all circumstances besides extraordinarily low mild (1 lux). At 5 and 20 lux, the Honor captures cleaner video than the competitors.
Each spatial and temporal noise are properly managed, even in low mild. That is true for each areas of plain shade and texture within the body.
Honor Magic4 Final, low noise
Huawei P50 Professional, some noise, particularly on textured areas
Xiaomi Mi 11 Extremely, some noise
Artifacts
Oppo Discover X2 Professional
Greatest: Oppo Discover X2 Professional (94)
For video artifacts, we test for a similar sorts of artifacts talked about within the Picture part, together with such video-specific artifacts as body price variation in several mild circumstances, judder impact, and transferring artifacts (artifacts equivalent to aliasing, shade quantization, and flare can usually be extra intrusive when transferring than in a nonetheless picture).
The Honor Magic4 Final doesn’t characteristic adaptive body charges and information video at 30 frames per second in all mild circumstances. In consequence, a judder impact might be noticeable when panning the digital camera. In distinction, the Xiaomi Mi 11 Extremely will increase the body price to 60 frames per second in indoor and brilliant outside circumstances with a purpose to cut back judder.
This graph exhibits video body charges in opposition to mild stage (in lux).
Stabilization
Honor Magic4 Final
102
103
Vivo X70 Professional+
Greatest: Vivo X70 Professional+ (103)
In these checks, we analyze residual movement when handholding the digital camera throughout recording, in addition to when strolling and working with the digital camera. We additionally search for stabilization artifacts equivalent to jello impact, sharpness variations between frames, and body shift (abrupt adjustments of framing).
Video stabilization is environment friendly at counteracting all types of digital camera movement and efficiency is general barely higher than the flagship competitors.
Honor Magic4 Final, efficient stabilization when strolling
Huawei P50 Professional, efficient stabilization when strolling
Xiaomi Mi 11 Extremely, efficient stabilization when strolling
Regardless of glorious compensation for movement, sharpness variations between frames are sometimes seen in low mild. On this pattern clip, we will see the impact when the digital camera is in movement. It’s also fairly noticeable on the Huawei P50 Professional, however the Xiaomi Mi 11 Extremely does a fairly good job at sustaining good sharpness on all frames.
Honor Magic4 Final, sharpness variations between frames
Huawei P50 Professional, some noise, sharpness variations between frames
Xiaomi Mi 11 Extremely, slight sharpness variations between frames
[ad_2]
